ODTÜ-BİLKENT Algebraic Geometry Seminar

(See all past talks
ordered according to speaker or date)

Refresh this page to see recent changes, if any


**** 2025 Spring Talks ****

 
Back View of Cats Group of Cats Chatting Together in Online
        Meeting on Laptop Funny Video Call | Premium AI-generated image

This semester we plan to have all of our seminars online


  1.   Zoom, 28 February 2025, Friday, 15:40

    Alexander Degtyarev - [Bilkent] - Split hyperplane sections on polarized K3-surfaces

    Abstract: I will discuss a new result which is an unexpected outcome, following a question by Igor Dolgachev, of a long saga about smooth rational curves on (quasi-)polarized $K3$-surfaces. The best known example of a $K3$-surface is a quartic surface in space. A simple dimension count shows that a typical quartic contains no lines. Obviously, some of them do and, according to B.~Segre, the maximal number is $64$ (an example is to be worked out). The key r\^ole in Segre's proof (as well as those by other authors) is played by plane sections that split completely into four lines, constituting the dual adjacency graph $K(4)$. A similar, though less used, phenomenon happens for sextic $K3$-surfaces in~$\mathbb{P}^4$ (complete intersections of a quadric and a cubic): a split hyperplane section consists of six lines, three from each of the two rulings, on a hyperboloid (the section of the quadric), thus constituting a $K(3,3)$.

    Going further, in degrees $8$ and $10$ one's sense of beauty suggests that the graphs should be the $1$-skeleton of a $3$-cube and Petersen  graph, respectfully. However, further advances to higher degrees required a systematic study of such $3$-regular graphs and, to my great surprise, I discovered that typically there is more than one! Even for sextics one can also imagine the $3$-prism (occurring when the hyperboloid itself splits into two planes).

    The ultimate outcome of this work is the complete classification of the graphs that occur as split hyperplane sections (a few dozens) and that of the configurations of split sections within a single surface (manageable starting from degree $10$). In particular, answering Igor's original question, the maximal number of split sections on a quartic is $72$, whereas on a sextic in $\mathbb{P}^4$ it is $40$ or $76$, depending on the question asked. The ultimate champion is the Kummer surface of degree~$12$: it has $90$ split hyperplane sections.

    The tools used (probably, not to be mentioned) are a fusion of graph theory and number theory, sewn together by the geometric insight.

     
      

  2. Zoom, 7 March 2025, Friday, 15:40

    John Christian Ottem - [Oslo] - Fano varieties with torsion in the third cohomology group

    Abstract: I will explain a construction of Fano varieties with torsion in their third cohomology group. The examples are constructed as double covers of linear sections of rank loci of symmetric matrices, and can be seen as higher-dimensional analogues of the Artin– Mumford threefold. As an application, we will answer a question of Voisin on the coniveau and strong coniveau filtrations of rationally connected varieties.

        

  3. Zoom, 14 March 2025, Friday, 15:40
      

    Emre Coşkun - [METU] - Stability Conditions

    Abstract: 

      
      
  4. Zoom, 21 March 2025, Friday, 15:40
      
    Selma Altınok Bhupal - [Hacettepe] - TBA

    Abstract: 

         

  5. Zoom, 28 March 2025, Friday, 15:40
      
    Mahir Bilen Can - [Tulane] - TBA

    Abstract: 

      
      

  6. Zoom, 4 April 2025, Friday, 15:40

    Hasan Suluyer - [ODTÜ] - TBA

    Abstract: 

         

  7. Zoom, 11 April 2025, Friday, 15:40
      
    Sema Salur - [Rochester/Bilkent] - TBA

    Abstract: 

     
      
  8. Zoom, 18 April 2025, Friday, 15:40
      
    Jean-Yves Welschinger - [lyon] - TBA

    Abstract:

       
     
  9. Zoom, 25 April 2025, Friday, 15:40
      
    Ali Ulaş Özgür Kişisel - [METU] - TBA

    Abstract:  


  10. Zoom, 9 May 2025, Friday, 15:40
      
    Ratko Darda - [Sabancı] - TBA

    Abstract:  




ODTÜ talks are either at Hüseyin Demir Seminar room or at Gündüz İkeda seminar room at the Mathematics building of ODTÜ.
Bilkent talks are
at room 141 of Faculty of Science A-building at Bilkent.
Zoom talks are online.


 


  Talks of previous years

Year

Year

1
2000 Fall Talks  (1-15) 2001 Spring Talks  (16-28) 2
2001 Fall Talks  (29-42) 2002 Spring Talks  (43-54)
3
2002 Fall Talks  (55-66) 2003 Spring Talks  (67-79) 4
2003 Fall Talks  (80-90) 2004 Spring Talks (91-99)
5
2004 Fall Talks (100-111) 2005 Spring Talks (112-121) 6
2005 Fall Talks (122-133) 2006 Spring Talks (134-145)
7
2006 Fall Talks (146-157) 2007 Spring Talks (158-168) 8
2007 Fall Talks (169-178) 2008 Spring Talks (179-189)
9
2008 Fall Talks (190-204) 2009 Spring Talks (205-217) 10
2009 Fall Talks (218-226) 2010 Spring Talks (227-238)
11
2010 Fall Talks (239-248) 2011 Spring Talks (249-260) 12
2011 Fall Talks (261-272) 2012 Spring Talks (273-283)
13
2012 Fall Talks (284-296) 2013 Spring Talks (297-308) 14
2013 Fall Talks (309-319) 2014 Spring Talks (320-334)
15
2014 Fall Talks (335-348) 2015 Spring Talks (349-360) 16
2015 Fall Talks (361-371) 2016 Spring Talks (372-379)
17
2016 Fall Talks (380-389) 2017 Spring Talks (390-401) 18
2017 Fall Talks (402-413) 2018 Spring Talks (414-425)
19
2018 Fall Talks (426-434) 2019 Spring Talks (435-445) 20
2019 Fall Talks (446-456) 2020 Spring Talks (457-465)
21
2020 Fall Talks (467-476)
2021 Spring Talks (477-488)
22
2021 Fall Talks (478-500)
2022 Spring Talks (501-511)
23
2022 Fall Talks (512-520)
2023 Spring Talks (520-530)
24
2023 Fall Talks (531-540)
2024 Spring Talks (541-550)
25
2024 Fall Talks (551-559)
2025 Spring Talks (560-569)



























.